What links to get?
Before I tell you this, let’s recall that links serve two purposes.
Remember those facts about Web search that I disclosed in the Introduction to SEO in Practice? Here they are, once again:
Here’s the obvious conclusion: it is more profitable to get links for the purpose of SEO. I often say "buy, beg or steal” but in fact, when you’re getting links, generally there’s just one parallel here: free — and non-free. So you can get a non-paid link if your page’s content is really valuable and important and someone decides to link to you. Or you get a free link in exchange for something: say, a reciprocal link. And you can get a paid link, which is probably much easier, but is not always that good. Here’s what Search Engines believe: if you’re buying a link from site A, you wish to get visitors from that site also come to your own site (like Alison was getting visitors from T-Jay). Search Engines do not actually expect that you would buy a link in order to get an extra "vote” and raise your site’s rankings. Therefore, if Search Engines assume that a link is paid, they don’t give it too much value and it won’t be any good for your rankings. That’s what happened to one of the largest US retailers, JCpenney. The company’s website ranked 1st for dozens of most competitive keywords like: dresses, bedding, area rugs, etc. However, some of the backlinks were placed on the websites not related to clothing at all. Eventually, Google stepped in and applied some “corrective measures,” thus burying JCPenny’s website. You can mark an advertising link. Search Engines themselves recommend using a rel=”nofollow” attribute in paid links. This attribute tells Search Engines not to follow and not to index a link. So if you buy a link and don’t want it to be involved in SEO, make sure it includes the rel=”nofollow” attribute. And let me repeat this once again: Search Engines believe in getting links to send people from one website to another. They expect that we shouldn’t be buying links for SEO. But the controversy is: if you’d buy links for the purpose of SEO, that would pay much better than if you’d buy links for visitors. Here’s a simple example: Say, you’re optimizing for the keyword ecards and have a paid link from www.birthdays.com. When we estimate a site’s traffic, we say that 100,000 of monthly traffic is really good. So let’s think that your link partner www.birthdays.com has got really good traffic. If you’ve got a paid link from some site, and 5% (which is normal for a link) of these people click on your link, then you’re getting 5,000 visitors. Now — the word ecards is searched about 4,090.000 times monthly all over the world (according to AdWords keyword tool). Statistics shows that 42.3% of web searchers click on the first result in Search Engines. So if you’ve got a #1 placement for ecards, you’ll be getting 1,730.070 visitors monthly. So in this case your #1 placement brings you 17 times more visitors than a link from traffic-rich site — which can result in a bigger profit. This demonstrates that good Search Engine position results in much more traffic than a paid link. And this is why we do SEO. Sites that are getting traffic thanks to optimization pay off better than sites getting traffic through paid links. © SEO in Practice >>> Back to TABLE OF CONTENTS <<< | |
Views: 355 | |
Total comments: 0 | |